{"id":17078,"date":"2017-09-13T09:00:09","date_gmt":"2017-09-13T13:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/?p=17078"},"modified":"2017-09-19T11:27:25","modified_gmt":"2017-09-19T15:27:25","slug":"late-august-hypoxia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/2017\/09\/13\/late-august-hypoxia\/","title":{"rendered":"Late August 2017 Hypoxia Report"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Photo

photo by Anne Weathersby<\/p><\/div>\n

Dissolved oxygen conditions in a portion of\u00a0Maryland\u2019s\u00a0Chesapeake Bay\u00a0mainstem were better than average for late August, reports the\u00a0Maryland Department of Natural Resources<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0hypoxic\u00a0water volume (areas with less than 2 mg\/l oxygen) in the study area was 0.33 cubic miles, which is much smaller than the late August 1985-2016 average of 0.80 cubic miles for that reduced area.\u00a0Crabs, fish, oysters and other creatures require oxygen to survive with levels above 5 mg\/l considered optimal to support aquatic health.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Data was only assessed between the lower Susquehanna River (CB1.1) and Chesapeake Bay stations (CB5.2), which is slightly north of the\u00a0Potomac River due to inhospitable weather conditions. This represents only 75 percent of the normal volume assessed for\u00a0Maryland\u2019s main bay. The remaining area, which was between the\u00a0Potomac River\u00a0and the Maryland-Virginia state line, consists of deeper waters where low dissolved oxygen may have been present. Therefore, the results discussed for late August are incomplete and not fully comparable to previous periods.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

(click to enlarge charts)<\/p><\/div>\n

The better-than-average conditions follow similar results from early August<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Conditions could be more favorable due, in part, to\u00a0the overall influence of Chesapeake Bay restoration efforts to reduce nutrient and sediment pollution, as well as\u00a0below average temperatures<\/a>. Higher temperatures generally cause more stratification of the water column, which inhibits oxygen from mixing into deeper waters. Waters with higher temperatures also hold less oxygen. Winds were also higher than average during sampling, likely mixing oxygen deeper into the water column.<\/p>\n

In the beginning of June, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Geological Survey, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science and University of Michigan scientists\u00a0predicted<\/a>\u00a0a slightly larger than average\u00a0hypoxic\u00a0volume for the bay due to higher spring flows (January-May) and nitrogen loading from the Susquehanna River.<\/p>\n

Scientists and natural resource managers study the volume and duration of bay\u00a0hypoxia\u00a0to determine possible impacts to bay life. Each year (June-September), the department computes these volumes from data collected by\u00a0Maryland\u00a0and\u00a0Virginia monitoring teams. Data collection is funded by these states and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s Chesapeake Bay Program. Monitoring and reporting will continue with a September report and year-end summary.<\/p>\n

More information on\u00a0Maryland\u2019s\u00a0Chesapeake Bay\u00a0water quality monitoring program and results can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dissolved oxygen conditions in a portion of\u00a0Maryland\u2019s\u00a0Chesapeake Bay\u00a0mainstem were better than average for late August, reports the\u00a0Maryland Department of Natural Resources. The\u00a0hypoxic\u00a0water volume (areas with less than 2 mg\/l oxygen) in the study area was 0.33 cubic miles, which is much smaller than the late August 1985-2016 average of 0.80 cubic miles for that reduced  Read the Rest…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":136,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[957,11,33],"tags":[2982,2960,3520,3447,2928,2926,3454,3153,3452,3290,3453],"class_list":["post-17078","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-appnews","category-fisheries","category-the-bay","tag-chesapeake-bay","tag-chesapeake-bay-program","tag-eyes-on-the-bay","tag-hypoxia-report","tag-national-oceanic-and-atmospheric-administration","tag-potomac-river","tag-susquehanna-river","tag-u-s-environmental-protection-agency","tag-u-s-geological-survey","tag-university-of-maryland-center-for-environmental-science","tag-university-of-michigan"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17078","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/136"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17078"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17078\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17149,"href":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17078\/revisions\/17149"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17078"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17078"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.maryland.gov\/dnr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17078"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}